Sales Engineering, Manufacturing, Sourcing and Consulting
The Caryl Company, LLC
410 Price Street
Water Valley, MS 38965
United States
ph: 662-473-4290
fax: 662-473-4289
alt: cell - 662-473-7175
thecaryl
Advantages of MIM
l High level of shape complexity
l Net-shape forming – reduced or eliminated
machining/finishing
l High material utilization
l Close dimensional control
l Good as-sintered surface finish
l Possible control of porosity – filtration,
lubrication, etc
l Suited to automation and mass production

MIM Process
For fast production of metal prototypes and low-volume parts, customers are increasingly turning to metal injection molding (MIM). The powder-metal parts can be produced at a substantial cost savings compared with machined metal. In service, they exhibit strength and modulus characteristics comparable to wrought metal and surpass the mechanical properties of metal parts produced via investment casting, forging, or machining. Because the metal comprises varied particle sizes and shapes, the resulting parts are significantly stronger than those generated via SLS. In addition, powder-metal has a consistent shrinkage of 12 to 16% depending on formulation. This shrink factor is easily compensated for in model and mold design to produce highly accurate metal parts. The primary limitation of MIM is the cost; it’s economical only for small parts up to 200 grams and with wall thickness of less than 0.25 inches.
Processing the metal, which is comprised of a low-melt binder mixed with 60 to 70% metal powder, is similar to plastic injection molding. Like plastic injection molding, each MIM project must be carefully evaluated before beginning to analyze shape and design areas that might pose molding or demolding challenges. In addition, variables in feedstock formulations including the type of binder being used, metal particle/grain size and shape distribution, and the mix between water- and gas- atomized particles must be considered as plans are made for injection molding.
Epoxy molds are produced for MIM following the same techniques used for plastic injection tools. “The major difference is in the gating. MIM gates have to feed directly into the mold and the tools can’t be warmed using cold shots. In addition, unlike the plastic injection molding, MIM utilizes low pressure with mold surfaces maintained at about 150°F depending on the binder system. Tools are air-cooled with mold temperature determined in large part by the binder system. The “waxier” the binder system, the cooler the mold can be run.
Once molded, the “green” metal parts are sent to debinding and sintering. Most of the binders are debound using water; thermal and catalytic debinding are also sometimes used. Parts are then placed in a furnace and heated at progressively higher temperatures until the metal begins to melt at about 2,550°F (1,400°C). At this point, the temperature is lowered to about 77°F (25°C) over a 30 to 40-minute period to ensure that the part holds its shape as molded.
Application Why use MIM? Materials: Automotive Improved Properties Stainless steel Computers Enhanced Details Low Alloy Steel Dental Reduced Waste/Machining Soft Magnetic Alloys Electrical Increased design freedom Low Expansion Alloys Hardware Reduced Assemblies Custom Blends Medical Ordnance
POWDERED METAL
Precision structural and magnetic, ferrous & non-ferrous, sintered metal components
METAL INJECTION MOLDING
Design Lmitations
• Inside closed cavities
• Undercuts on internal bores
• Very sharp corners or edges
• Long piece without taper
• Holes smaller than 0.1 mm
• Wall thinner than 0.1 mm
• Thin, slender sections attached to thick sections
• Hard to manufacture the components over 25 mm thick
or over 1 Kg weight
Contact:
thecarylcompany@bellsouth.net
The Caryl Company, LLC
410 Price Street
Water Valley, MS 38965
United States
ph: 662-473-4290
fax: 662-473-4289
alt: cell - 662-473-7175
thecaryl